Jim Green's 90q 20vt - 636whp 07k

Document and share your build!
cuatrokoop

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by cuatrokoop »

ShavedQuattro wrote:I say you get Weldon to send you two sets of front urS6 fenders. Cut the flares off the front and put them on the right sides. Then I say you cut off the other front sets, and flop them left to right in the rear, effectively turning them around. Weld em on, or bond them. Those flares are huge. I think they are probably bigger then even the a6's.

Eric, you are talking v6 flares, not v8 ones. The v8 a6 cars came with 255-40-17s on 8" wide wheels. These are usually 25.4" tall wheels...


Yes, true, but the wheel well isn't that much larger on the V8 cars. Pretty much any fender will require work to use it's flare for various reasons. Even flares from a B4 will require a decent amount of work to fit on a B3. I'd do steel, since you'd already have to cut part of the factory "flare" off the car to make room for wider tires anyway...
gruppe5

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by gruppe5 »

Maybe you could try getting some Allroad plastic arches to try fitment.
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by audifreakjim »

ShavedQuattro wrote:Check out what the Tire Rack says about the 255's on 8" wide wheels that they always condemn.

Audi mounts a 255/40-17 tire on the 17x8 wheel. Most tire companies suggest using a 8.5 - 10.0 width rim. We will also allow 8" rims to be sold using the 255/40 tire.


Does anybody know the oem tire that came on the a6 4.2?


My OEM Spare is a 255/40-17
calunamn

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by calunamn »

Jim,

I noticed Zerb mentioned our airbox (Spectre). Since you are local to me if you need any intake components let me know. I'm in Anaheim now, so a lot closer than I used to be in Corona.
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Mcstiff »

Did somebody say wide front and rear wings? http://www.s2forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=48263

Why do the things I want come up when I cannot haz?
ChrisAudi80
Posts: 875
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by ChrisAudi80 »

You can haz cheezburger though...
96 S6 auto
95 80Q AEB VEMS
a_CQ

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by a_CQ »

You can fit 255 tires under the CQ with some flaring of the fenders. With the perfect offset and 9" wheel I will bet you can fit 265 if not 275 series tires.

Jim, if you go to even CQ width levels I think you will be happy enough with 255 tires. I mean how much wider do you really need for a primarily street car? You are better off spending money on reallly good sticky rubber than buying cheap Kumhos and going as wide as you can. I'm sure you know this, you've tracked the car enough to realize potentials of quality tire.
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Mcstiff »

ChrisAudi80 wrote:You can haz cheezburger though...


Image
Spike_Rally

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Spike_Rally »

I vote B4 or even URS. I cut out the rear flares out of a B4 with the intention of grafting them onto my 80 but I decided my B3 just wasn't quite worth all the work. Your car, on the other hand, would look amazing widebody and possibly resprayed imola yellow?

URS on a coupe:
Image


Or you could go for a time attack look and do rivet on flares like Timmy did on the S4K, that would look mean.
Image
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Mcstiff »

If a CQ can run 265s with KWs (modified arms) why not do that first? You should be able to fit <=265s under your front B4 flairs and get close in the rear.
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Hank »

Spike_Rally wrote:I vote B4 or even URS. I cut out the rear flares out of a B4 with the intention of grafting them onto my 80 but I decided my B3 just wasn't quite worth all the work. Your car, on the other hand, would look amazing widebody and possibly resprayed imola yellow?

URS on a coupe:
Image


Any more pictures of the b3 with urS flares on it?
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by audifreakjim »

Thanks for the pics of the urS fenders, I have a few on the way so this seems to be the best option at this point.

Peter, this is not any different than the rest of the car, I mean I have a completely obnoxious motor, why not go with obnoxious wheels and tires under huge flares? :P I agree that 255's would be a huge improvement, and that is likely where I will end up at first, but if I am going to go through the pain of flaring the rear, I want to be able to fit something even wider. I have moved on from street tires and have run R compounds at the last three events :D I still have a ways to go as a driver, but the feedback from more than a few instructors who have been in the car is it really needs wider tires, and I can't agree more.

Ed,on the B3 the absolute widest tire you can put in the rear is a 235, and it still rubs on the highest load corners.

My car will never be Imolla! I am going to go with the color on the front of the car. Fresh LY1A (Ginster) with Clear :)
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Mcstiff »

audifreakjim wrote:Ed,on the B3 the absolute widest tire you can put in the rear is a 235, and it still rubs on the highest load corners.


Is that with the stock arms?
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by audifreakjim »

Yep, stock arms. What are you thinking?
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Mcstiff »

Rotate the arms (like KWs) and run more offset.
SEStone
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:45 pm
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by SEStone »

You can't on the rear ;).

Sam
Sam Stone
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Mcstiff »

I guess I'm missing something are they not in the way?
a_CQ

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by a_CQ »

You know, you do have a point there...if you have to modify th erear then might as well make room fo rmore, even if you don't use it, it will make fitting 255s a LOT more comfortably..

Have you thought about Reiger flares? Not even sure this stuff is still made?

Image

Image

Definetely looks like 255+size tire...

Image
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by audifreakjim »

The arms are cast into the bearing housing so they are not going anywhere. Unless of course I put front struts in the rear, and rotated the arms in, then I could have 4 wheel steering!
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by audifreakjim »

Now we are talking, those are definitely more than 255! They look even wider than 275's.

I will get the 255's and the fat 5's on the car once I get the S2 hubs on go from there. I like the way the green car looks from the rear, but the side profile is blah.
a_CQ

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by a_CQ »

And the coupe rear flares...with some work they could look real good..

Image


Last thing, remember that Coupe with e46 M3 fender flares? That looked hoot, but I always lose the pics of that.
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Mcstiff »

Ah! Coupe rear housings or fronts in the rear?

Anyway, I was checking out a Reiger Coupé the other night. Its also cool that they eliminated the rubber lower trim. The bumper is meh but has ~4" to the crank pulley.
Derracuda
Posts: 264
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:22 pm

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Derracuda »

Mcstiff wrote:If a CQ can run 265s with KWs (modified arms) why not do that first? You should be able to fit <=265s under your front B4 flairs and get close in the rear.




not so much on the rear... B3 flares are narrower than on a 4kq, and i've pushed the limits on that with 235's that were a bit too tall. flares are the only solution unfortunately
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by Mcstiff »

Not well versed on these B3s :P You don't want / need a lot of rubber in the rear of front engined understeering pig. :D The MTM RSR was 265/35R17 F and 235/45R17 R!
cuatrokoop

Re: Jim Green's 90 20vt + PTE5857 + Meth = 472++whp

Post by cuatrokoop »

Agree....You could run 245-255's up front and a 225-235 out back and possibly get some neutrality along with some suspension tweaking (spring and damper rates) that won't give you snap O.S. Something to think about.
Post Reply