Audilard wrote:That's awesome Jim. Keeps me motivated to work on my car.
:stupid:
Audilard wrote:That's awesome Jim. Keeps me motivated to work on my car.
audifreakjim wrote:They pulled me a few times down the straits on my low boost map, and then I would catch them very quickly in the corners. After this happened a few times, I went to the high boost map




extreme90path wrote:EDIT: Of course CC brakes are NOT affordable.
Apriliapilot wrote:I was under the impression that the ZR-1 and the Enzo have the same brakes


ShavedQuattro wrote:Jim, the 996tt calipers are bigger pistons and pad area when compared to the regular 996 units, but be aware that they require custom brackets not available from Apikol att the moment. I am a sneeze away from converting my front to b4 stuff, so maybe i'll make the right brackets for them. The benfit of the 996tt caliper is that they are dimensionally bigger than 996 calipers, and thus not as desireable for the regular market. I think I paid 450$ shipped for mine with lines, new pads and all the shim crap. The other cool part is that the 996 non turbo calipers were designed to go over 318(IIRC)x28mm rotors, where the 996 were designed to fit over larger 330x32mm rotors. 32mm puts you closer to 1.25" thick rotors which is more readily available for rings if you go to a two piece. The problem is that the larger calipers do pose fitment issues with the larger rotors in 17" wheels. I can get my fat fives on currently, but with the bad offset of the 1 piece upright, the enkeis don't fit without spacers. I am pretty sure they would with a 2 piece though.


ShavedQuattro wrote:I think that info is wrong. Don't make me take a pad out! I Rememeber comparing thr two side by side I thought. Wouldn't be the first time I was wrong though

Apriliapilot wrote:I was under the impression that the ZR-1 and the Enzo have the same brakes

