Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 7:59 am
That motor will be nice when it's done...
The Project Pad
Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy
Page 91 of 130
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:04 pm
Agree, Petar...
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:08 pm
a_CQ wrote:That motor will be nice when it's done...
yeah duh! thanks capt. understatment
haha jk
hank makes a lot of beautiful stuff, im sure the new lump will be mucho sexy as well
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:17 am
Wow, that's rough, but it's not true progress without a setback or two.
Keep up the great work. I'm looking forward to the 2.6L!
I'm surprised you didn't hear that valve head banging around in there...
Keep up the great work. I'm looking forward to the 2.6L!
I'm surprised you didn't hear that valve head banging around in there...
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:37 am
RSCoupe wrote: I'm looking forward to the 2.6L!
I saw it being worked on last night.
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:38 am
and you didn't call?
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:25 am
PICS!!!!
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:59 am
Hybrid_Hatch wrote:and you didn't call?
I thought you lived at the Lab and were always there...
my2000apb wrote:PICS!!!!
I signed a waiver, went through a security scanner and had to leave all cameras outside the Lab. Sorry. The prototype is impressive. Lofty hp and tq goals with a low rpm threshold. Discussing "the kit" that will be available got the wheels turning inside my head. Resistance is futile.
Imagine...2.6 liter 5 cylinder with a billet wheel 30r...25 psi at 3300 rpms....or sooner....400whp, 400+tq....
Hank is the devil.
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:07 pm
darin, jsut go for a drive and be happy!!! haah
hahaha @ security, im sure there will be a grand unveiling
2.6L 5 cyl with a billet wheel , and it comes 3" vband .82 ar (which is great for more testing)
from ForcedPerformance website
"This turbocharger is recommended for applications running 40psi boost pressure that target the 800-900whp range. The FP HTA™ GT3794R has exceeded 900whp easily during testing as well has running 8's in the quarter mile with trap speeds in excess of 160mph."
http://store.forcedperformance.net/merc ... e=Turbo-FP
hahaha @ security, im sure there will be a grand unveiling
2.6L 5 cyl with a billet wheel , and it comes 3" vband .82 ar (which is great for more testing)
from ForcedPerformance website
"This turbocharger is recommended for applications running 40psi boost pressure that target the 800-900whp range. The FP HTA™ GT3794R has exceeded 900whp easily during testing as well has running 8's in the quarter mile with trap speeds in excess of 160mph."
http://store.forcedperformance.net/merc ... e=Turbo-FP
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:10 pm
yeah duh! thanks capt. understatment
I just know since I'm supplying him with a block...and there goes my plan for a monster turbo build!
I saw it being worked on last night.
how is that? The block is just leaving Chicago today?? But I hear this may be the fastest big BIG power build in a while...
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:14 pm
a_CQ wrote:how is that? The block is just leaving Chicago today?? But I hear this may be the fastest big BIG power build in a while...
Which block are you sending him?
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:20 pm
Audilard wrote:a_CQ wrote:how is that? The block is just leaving Chicago today?? But I hear this may be the fastest big BIG power build in a while...
Which block are you sending him?
dont forget about the waiver
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:39 pm
my2000apb wrote:Audilard wrote:a_CQ wrote:how is that? The block is just leaving Chicago today?? But I hear this may be the fastest big BIG power build in a while...
Which block are you sending him?
dont forget about the waiver
I'm not sure what I can and can't discuss under the confidentiality agreement.
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:14 pm
is there an attorney in the house?
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:39 pm
my2000apb wrote:is there an attorney in the house?
Right here! Just tell me everything, and I'll tell you what can and can't be talked about. :wink:
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:54 pm
LOL. You guys are too much. Tim, unfortunately, the 37r does not come with a tial Vband inlet option. That is okay, as I am not willing to go any bigger of a turbo for road racing. That is really what I want the car to double up as. My goal for the project is 700whp/700Wtq, and I think the 3586r will get me there with e85. I need/want at least 4000 rpm of meaty power without going dry sump. I am hoping that the extra 350cc of displacement will get me 500whp from 4000-8500 with 700 available at 6500-8500. The 3586r is supposively within 150rpm of hta3582r spool, so if I can gain 400rpm with the extra displacement, I can lose 150 and end up at around 3900rpm with spool up.
8)
I am thinking of building a new manifold though that uses the larger 42r style tial inlet so that I can have the option of having a dyno queen for product developement. Realistically, 700whp is enough, even for me. Famous last words.
8)
I am thinking of building a new manifold though that uses the larger 42r style tial inlet so that I can have the option of having a dyno queen for product developement. Realistically, 700whp is enough, even for me. Famous last words.
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:21 pm
ShavedQuattro wrote: Realistically, 700whp is enough, even for me. Famous last words.
July 20th. 1:54 p.m. Let it be written....Let it be..
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:31 pm
ah i see, its jsut vband out, weak, it will be out at some point im sure
but the powerband argument wins all day
keep it lower and w/o drysump makes it much more attainable
i cant wait to see more
but the powerband argument wins all day
keep it lower and w/o drysump makes it much more attainable
i cant wait to see more
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:38 pm
RSCoupe wrote:my2000apb wrote:is there an attorney in the house?
Right here! Just tell me everything, and I'll tell you what can and can't be talked about. :wink:
Yep, sounds like something a lawyer would say...
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:19 pm
RSCoupe wrote:my2000apb wrote:is there an attorney in the house?
Right here! Just tell me everything, and I'll tell you what can and can't be talked about. :wink:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:33 pm
700whp 700 wtq damn that will be a task
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:52 pm
^^^ thats for damn sure
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:07 pm
All this stroker talk...couldn't help it:
When i introduced it to the Pale Horse it peed on the floor?!
When i introduced it to the Pale Horse it peed on the floor?!
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:45 pm
Nice!!
Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:00 pm
That is what the inside of the valve looks like.
Looks like the tial hotside took a beating as well. Hopefully I can save it... after two full days in acid, the aluminum us almost all eaten away. Hopefully I can chip out the welded crap in there and weld some areas to get my .82 back. As it stands, the housing is more like a .95!